On 10/08/06, Erik Moeller <eloquence(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/10/06, maru dubshinki
<marudubshinki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> What I see here is a double standard: there's
a tiny wiff of a
> problem and a user is indef banned, while vastly worse problems like
> vandals and copyright violators at least get the courtesy of the
> {{test}} templates.
Then let's not have a double standard, but a
general mechanism to
submit new articles where conflicts of interest may exist for
community review prior to publication, and ask editors (including
yourself) to follow that process. Here's a quick proposal:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflicts_of_interest
Or they could, um, note it on the talk page? Rather than put yet
another procedure in place which will have the effect of "why bother."
Unless that's the purpose.
- d.