On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 14:24:33 -0400
jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The last time you argued for "simple and
verifiable fact", they were
of the "everybody knows it's true" and "it's obvious" sort,
but not
the kind that could actually be found in any reliable sources.
"The foreskin is erogenous" ?
Actually that can be found in reliable sources.
So you're
saying... WP's priority is to be neutral rather
than factual? Are you... Hmm... I see, that explains a couple
of things.
So you're saying... your priority is to invent strawman arguments for
me rather than address the issues? Are you... Hmm... I see, that
explains a couple of things.
Actually I meant to be ad hominem, like you were and still are.
Let me try again:
"Adress the issues"? I can't change that you don't like facts.