On 8/9/06, Dabljuh <dabljuh(a)gmx.net> wrote:
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 13:55:51 -0400
jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
That's exactly what every crackpot who has
discovered "The TRUTH"
insists; they have the real facts, and all the reliable sources,
scientific studies, and peer reviewed articles in the world are simply
the work of "ignorant idiots". And that's exactly the viewpoint that
got you banned from Wikipedia; you didn't care what the policies said,
or what reliable sources said, because you knew "The TRUTH", and
everyone else was simply ignorant.
Jay.
Er, yeah.
Read again:
> Give WP:NPOV a "facts override"
clause. That is,
> if something is a simple and verifiable fact, npov is
> not meant to relativate it when a majority of people
> are misinformed or simply don't like the information.
I said verifiable (which also implies reliable sources)
The last time you argued for "simple and verifiable fact", they were
of the "everybody knows it's true" and "it's obvious" sort,
but not
the kind that could actually be found in any reliable sources.
So you're saying... WP's priority is to be
neutral rather
than factual? Are you... Hmm... I see, that explains a couple
of things.
So you're saying... your priority is to invent strawman arguments for
me rather than address the issues? Are you... Hmm... I see, that
explains a couple of things.
Jay.