On 8/9/06, Dabljuh dabljuh@gmx.net wrote:
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 13:55:51 -0400 jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
That's exactly what every crackpot who has discovered "The TRUTH" insists; they have the real facts, and all the reliable sources, scientific studies, and peer reviewed articles in the world are simply the work of "ignorant idiots". And that's exactly the viewpoint that got you banned from Wikipedia; you didn't care what the policies said, or what reliable sources said, because you knew "The TRUTH", and everyone else was simply ignorant.
Jay.
Er, yeah.
Read again:
Give WP:NPOV a "facts override" clause. That is, if something is a simple and verifiable fact, npov is not meant to relativate it when a majority of people are misinformed or simply don't like the information.
I said verifiable (which also implies reliable sources)
The last time you argued for "simple and verifiable fact", they were of the "everybody knows it's true" and "it's obvious" sort, but not the kind that could actually be found in any reliable sources.
So you're saying... WP's priority is to be neutral rather than factual? Are you... Hmm... I see, that explains a couple of things.
So you're saying... your priority is to invent strawman arguments for me rather than address the issues? Are you... Hmm... I see, that explains a couple of things.
Jay.