On 4/22/06, Will (Zsinj) Bumgarner <wbzsinj(a)gmail.com> wrote:
What I don't understand is when people look
themselves up and see
erroneous information, they don't just go and fix it. It's as if they
have something to prove by saying "Wikipedia sucks" instead of
contributing to the effort and making Wikipedia better.
--Zsinj
_______________________________________________
Well, in this particular case I
would say that Sir Ian is kind of busy
with paying work. He's not in the line of work that gives him the time
to hang around Wikipedia. Sure, a blog can be done, but writing
articles even the ones about yourself requires looking up sources and
pushing off POV pushers and fans.
As for unbalanced: I still have no idea what people's fascination is
with celeb's sexuality. Anything more than a line unbalances an
article. Say what their sexuality is if relevant, put in a source and
go on. We don't need entire sections on the subject unless the subject
himself has frequently discussed it.
Mgm