On 4/22/06, Will (Zsinj) Bumgarner wbzsinj@gmail.com wrote:
What I don't understand is when people look themselves up and see erroneous information, they don't just go and fix it. It's as if they have something to prove by saying "Wikipedia sucks" instead of contributing to the effort and making Wikipedia better.
--Zsinj _______________________________________________
Well, in this particular case I would say that Sir Ian is kind of busy with paying work. He's not in the line of work that gives him the time to hang around Wikipedia. Sure, a blog can be done, but writing articles even the ones about yourself requires looking up sources and pushing off POV pushers and fans.
As for unbalanced: I still have no idea what people's fascination is with celeb's sexuality. Anything more than a line unbalances an article. Say what their sexuality is if relevant, put in a source and go on. We don't need entire sections on the subject unless the subject himself has frequently discussed it.
Mgm