On 4/19/06, Matt R matt_crypto@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Katefan0 katefan0wiki@gmail.com:
I think that lately Danny has not been using the OFFICE tag because people tend to raise a fuss over things protected under this specific policy, and more publicity to/furor over an issue that's already very sensitive is a thorny thing to deal with. My guess, anyway.
Forgive me if I haven't understood this correctly, but: OFFICE actions are unreversible on pain of dire consequences (e.g. desysopping and indefinite banning), yet anything that Danny does could be an OFFICE action even though not identified as such? This seems very problematic; is there now a class of editor (Danny) whose actions noone can now dare risk undoing in case the action turns out to be an OFFICE action? Surely not.
-- Matt
Danny has a talk page, he has email, and he has a phone number, all well published. USE THEM.
Kelly