It doesn't seem to me like Greasemonkey could solve the systemic problem-- it'd just help deal with it better for a couple individual users who choose to use it. How could we systemically work to prevent deterioration? I've identified the following causes:
1.Multiple vandalisms, where only some are reverted 2.Additions of poorly written stuff, but stuff not bad enough to warrant straight up reverting. 3.Citations getting removed 4.Unecessary factoids and observations getting added.