On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 11:56:46 -0500, you wrote:
First, remove all unverifiable statements from the article. Insist firmly on the talk page that nothing goes back into the article without a solid site to a mainstream publication. Second, after a couple of weeks of demonstrating that there is therefore nothing to be said, AfD would be appropriate and likely to succeed.
You forget - this is a sex-related article. On AfD, the fact that it scores thousands of Google hits will mean that it is "notable" and therefore it will be kept. The lack of content will be swiftly reverted by reference to those Google hits.
That's what happened to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland_steamer anyway. We now have all the "popular culture" cruft back in there, and still absolutely no reliable sources. Unless you count the entry in the online dictionary of sex added by the well-known and trusted user "Anonymous", which some people apparently do. Guy (JzG)