On 4/10/06, John Lee johnleemk@gawab.com wrote:
Just a sidenote, but I would have closed that as a delete. Most of the keep "votes" came from anons or new editors, so that combined with the fact that none of them cited policy as a reason to keep (while the deleters did) should have been enough to discount their votes (assuming we are pretending WP:IS a democracy). The article as it stands right now *really* tempts me to speedy it right away, but fortunately I've learnt not to meddle with the community's will, which apparently choose and picks policy as it likes (incidentally, so do admins -- so we're all guilty here). Yeah. Just rambling here. :p
Eep, I feel dirty. I was thinking of mischievously redirecting the article to some presumed list on disputed sexual acts, but all the acts actually have "articles" on them. The standard of them is appalling though, with moral judgments, slang terms, lack of referencing and perhaps original research rife. And some of them are just plain wrong...Most of the examples in [[Ménage à trois]] are love triangles, for instance.
It really is a problem that people with good taste and common sense stay away from these articles.
Steve