-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
David Alexander Russell stated for the record:
Not if we wrote it properly. The only way a policy can
be 'gamed' if it
is written ambiguously or in a way that is down to interpretation (e.g.
CSD T1 - what exactly 'divisive' means is down to the individual, and
two people acting in good faith can interpret it in completely different
ways). If, for example, we simply wrote it as:
Any image depicting children engaged in sexual intercourse or posing
with sex toys
There is nothing in that (that I can see) which could possibly be
'gamed' or misinterpreted.
Cynical
A pair of one-inch diameter metal balls. Sex toy, or parts of a bearing?
- --
Sean Barrett | We completely deny the allegations, and
sean(a)epoptic.org | we're trying to identify the alligators.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEN+xXMAt1wyd9d+URAnv6AKCFLEK0jHaNwUOwCLYTFRMXAKKk9QCbBKdl
yOOkMpWLHAct05WLLaTd+JY=
=twe1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----