On 4/5/06, Matt R matt_crypto@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
\I don't think your description is particularly fair or objective. I support the removal of the image in question, but I recognise that at least some of those who argued for it to be it kept did so out of good faith and a desire to create the best encyclopedia possible. I don't think they were trolling or motivated by a desire to supply pedophiles with child porn.
I think this meta-debate is not doing anything constructive. It's pretty clear that the image is staying deleted at this point. Arguing about who said what to whom isn't going to accomplish anything for us besides toxifying the evironment even further. I think it's time we walked away from this one.
Ryan