Philip Welch wrote:
I support the removal of the image in question, but I recognise that at least some of those who argued for it to be it kept did so out of good faith and a desire to create the best encyclopedia possible. I don't think they were trolling or motivated by a desire to supply pedophiles with child porn.
I agree with Matt. This is not a profitable direction for discussion.
Absolutely, but it is VERY important to pay attention to the fact that we are often trolled in this way, and that there are POV pushers involved. One clever way to troll is to raise the 'censorship' red herring in a way that makes it difficult to talk about serious questions of editorial judgment, questions about which reasonable people may of course differ without feeling that the other side is trying to censor.
--Jimbo