Philip Welch wrote:
I support the
removal
of the image in question, but I recognise that at least some of
those who argued
for it to be it kept did so out of good faith and a desire to
create the best encyclopedia
possible. I don't think they were trolling or motivated by a desire
to supply pedophiles
with child porn.
I agree with Matt. This is not a profitable direction for discussion.
Absolutely, but it is VERY important to pay attention to the fact that
we are often trolled in this way, and that there are POV pushers
involved. One clever way to troll is to raise the 'censorship' red
herring in a way that makes it difficult to talk about serious questions
of editorial judgment, questions about which reasonable people may of
course differ without feeling that the other side is trying to censor.
--Jimbo
--
#######################################################################
# Office: 1-727-231-0101 | Free Culture and Free Knowledge #
#
http://www.wikipedia.org | Building a free world #
#######################################################################