On 9/30/05, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/30/05, Tony Sidaway f.crdfa@gmail.com wrote:
Actually I don't think it can be fixed. I am convinced that it could be safely wound down provided a procedure for dealing with hoax/unverifiable articles was instituted along the same lines as Wikipedia:Copyright_Problems.
Sorry I thought people wanted a system which worked. WP:CP is improveing but it still has a long way to go.
-- geni
Perhaps I'm completely oblivious, but WP:CP seems to work fine from where I'm standing. The only problem it has is the immense backlogs it gets every once in a while, but that can be resolved by encouraging people to maintain it. The process itself doesn't appear to "have a long way to go" or am I missing something.
About deletion: There's a simple way to avoid repeated run-ins with AFD. Write better articles that even hard-core deletionists wouldn't think of deleting. One or 2 lines more in a stub can make the difference between viable context or possible deletion candidate.
--Mgm