On 9/19/05, Ryan W. (Merovingian) bigwiki@earthling.net wrote:
It's not a bad idea, but I don't see it as necessary unless:
- An inactive account was hacked into.
2, If the admin in question requests it.
The only reason I can think of would be that having inactive admins on the books might inflate admin numbers, but we already have [[WP:LA]], which is split into "active", "semi-active" and "inactive" groups as it is.