Tony Sidaway wrote: <snip>
For instance today's front page contains an article about the Krag-Petersson repeating rifle which doesn't manage to give any dates at all until the second paragraph (and then only the date of adoption by the Norwegian Navy), although the most significant thing about the rifle is that it was "the first repeating rifle adopted by the armed forces of Norway" How did the editors manage to miss the date out of the first sentence? How did it pass FA in that state?
Vote stacking on IRC.
/me runs