I don't see how people can form a valid opinion about undeleting an article if they can't compare the original AFD/VFD against the article that was deleted. Temporary undeletion may even uncover additional research that could seal an undeletion without doubt.
There may be consensus to delete, but if the last vote went against consensus and provided a valid reason, the reason "AFD was valid" makes no sense at all.
--Mgm
On 9/16/05, Tony Sidaway f.crdfa@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/16/05, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
I wasn't suggesting you restore it I was jsuting seeing how you could mess with the rules to atchive odd results.
Er, thanks but no thanks. I know VFU is a bit weird at the moment, but that no excuse for taking an article deleted in process through AfD again, for a post-mortem rerun. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l