On 9/16/05, Tony Sidaway f.crdfa@gmail.com wrote:
Oh but it is. That is one of my key points: an argument improperly neglected (for instance, if conditions mentioned in the original nomination have been met--which is grounds for a keep result unless there is some overriding reason to delete, such as a copyright violation). Or say an editor finds that an article has been deleted while he was otherwise occupied, and he raises the necessary undelete quorum. Or perhaps the article was deleted by a consensus on AfD despite the well documented fact that the subject was the President of Mauritania for six months.
I don't think there is anything in policy to stop you relisting a deleted article on AFD. could be interesting to try.