From: Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net
Worldtraveller wrote:
I'd support that position. How could having unencyclopaedic articles not damage the credibility of an encyclopaedia?
-----Original Message----- From: Kelly Martin [mailto:kelly.lynn.martin@gmail.com]
On 9/14/05, JAY JG jayjg@hotmail.com wrote:
It reduces the credibility of the project.
That's a highly disputable claim for which I doubt you can produce much in the way of support.
The burden of proof lies with the person making the hypothesis, not the person opposing it.
The claim is "Unencyclopedic articles reduce the credibility of the encyclopedia" To put the burden on the person denying the claim would have him running around looking for information which he believes does not exist; it would require him to act irrationally.
No, the real claim is "AfD is damaging the project and should be deleted". The burden of proof is on those who make that claim.
Jay.