On 9/14/05, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/14/05, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
geni wrote:
...And WP:CP could still take use of the admin deletion features...
not if you are aiming for PWD.
He just said that he's not, at least when it comes to dealing with copyright problems. You're the only one I've seen in this thread who's suggesting that PWD would be used that way. Why can't VfD and CP use different ways of deleting pages?
Because accuseing something of being a copyvio will become a lot more common rather than being a tectic of last resort.
We don't just delete copyvios because they're accused of it. We tend to delete them when they're properly accused of it, tagged (with a link of where it's from), rot on [[WP:CP]] for a month or so, and if it's really a copyvio (or just nobody figures out it isn't..), it's deleted. With PWD being used for regular deletions, theoretically we could have more admins to work on [[WP:CP]].
As for the delete warring, there's no reason an admin couldn't come around, protect the page, and use {{deletedpage}}, like we already do when people try to repeatedly re-create deleted materials, or protect it on an undeleted version, like we already do when people vandalize articles heavily.