On Sep 11, 2005, at 12:26 PM, Pawe³ Dembowski wrote:
What you are proposing is primary source information. Wikipedia is not a primary source. It is basically a tertiary (and to a small extent, secondary) source. This is what no original research means: don't do research that no-one has done before. I'd say someone _doing_ research on a bus stop makes it fairly noteworthy... Sam
The primary source of bus stop information is my local bus company's website. Basing articles on their schedule would not be original research.
There is also a practical, though I think unwritten, rule against articles that can never be anything more than stubs.
-Snowspinner