JAY JG wrote:
From: Alphax alphasigmax@gmail.com
But yes, splitting it up would probably not fix anything. SO how about called it "articles for merging"?
That would be un-helpful, since the majority of intentions and outcomes are for deletion. Yes, sometimes the consensus is for merging the article, but that's not the most typical outcome. Neologisms, original research, rants, advertisements, pet theories, bands that are planning to record their first CD any day now, [[List of flags featuring one or more stars and the colors red, blue, and white]] etc. don't qualify under Speedy deletion rules, but still have no place in an encyclopedia.
Now I understand why people leave so quickly...
A: "This article should be deleted." B: "But it's verifiable!" A: "It's non-notable and unencyplodic." C: "There are no notability policies! It's verifiable and isn't original research!" A: "Have read the article? We don't need an article on this! It has no place in a general purpsose encyclopedia!" D: "JIMBO SEZ: Wiki is not paper, so it can stay." A: "ARRRRRRGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"