-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
geni wrote:
On 10/28/05, Alphax alphasigmax@gmail.com wrote:
But it's perfectly OK to support someone who says "I will delete any article where there is a majority of delete votes, no matter what the reasons are for the keep votes"?
Maybe.
I went looking through last week's AFD pages (eg. October 17-21). I saw a few articles where the "majority" of votes were to delete, but the last few votes included statements such as "keep, I have verified and rewritten the article..." and "keep after excellent rewrite".
Are you telling me that you would have deleted such articles? Why don't we actually go back to "votes for deletion" and implement voting software for the page? If the process is so mechanical and requires no brainpower whatsoever, why not just automate it?
(Oh yes, I forget to mention: I have a fully-functional auto-voter which merely requires you to edit the AFD subpage in question. Contact me off-list for details.)
- -- Alphax | /"\ Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \