-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
JAY JG wrote:
From: Kelly
Martin <kelly.lynn.martin(a)gmail.com>
On 10/25/05, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Prove it. I haven't seen any of these voteing
blocks.
Then you're not watching. The existence of voting blocks is quite
evident in RfA.
In the past you've alleged voting blocks in RfA based on their
"deletionist" tendencies, and this was discussed on this mailing
list. Are you still making this claim?
I would claim that they do; put yourself forward as an inclusionist and
the inclusionists will vote for you, and the deletionists will stay
quiet and pretend they don't exist, and vice versa. Put yourself forward
as someone who will ignore the typical "d nn" and "keep we need all
articles" votes, and wow! They all get mad and shoot you down in flames.
As a member of one of these inclusionist/deletionist groups plainly
stated [1]:
In general, inclusionists tend to vote
"keep" on articles they think
should be kept, and abstain entirely from articles they think should
be deleted. Deletionists tend to vote "delete" on articles they think
should be deleted, and abstain from those they think should be kept.
[1]
http://tinyurl.com/8hsuu
- --
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQEVAwUBQ2GtjrMAAH8MeUlWAQgaZggArH5w5tTyP/3v3lQvAgerLJuqINcQ19/T
aLcrfKpH3mvTYxXqui00ZsrNNNxwT9Ufun9pNti2YvCpCmgpq0VDfsgNvGXfDamx
KeRrucbDcZexKhZnm399KqjMZiEy3sglU2mlH/KTL1YFsJQhglH8yP21K//8FLjZ
pzIoz5loiP7duYW7mhh/k17UQFAWCH2d7dlkE/QaXkqh+yR+lhzi9VglQ7s81yIG
NMFa97t7lcQcA4YpGn2KhxklymHVu4ANrbsijMJBIhRMEFhXs+jsy5ugpOcxPQ5P
ZYVXANAcnLUKfAH2RNdS+z85/84UIvsGbY9fwQLxrN6x3G2zn7bzyg==
=wl0k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----