Anthony DiPierro wrote:
On 10/26/05, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/26/05, Anthony DiPierro <wikispam at inbox.org> wrote:
> > If an actual no-foolin' expert dissents,
then there isn't consensus in the
> > first place.
> And if an actual no-foolin' expert supports
the consensus?
Supports what consensus? I just said, if people
can't come to a general
agreement, then there *is* no consensus. You seem to be mistaking majority
with consensus.
"Consensus" is AFD jargon for "66% delete votes, for any reason or
none." Really. It is.
I'm seeing myself describe how it actually works on AFD/VFU at present
and people here seem incredulous. Go to AFD, participate in the
"discussions" and see for yourself if you don't believe what I'm
saying.
- d.
- d.