-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
Anthony DiPierro wrote:
On 10/25/05, Alphax alphasigmax@gmail.com wrote:
Anthony DiPierro wrote:
On 10/24/05, Justin Cormack justin@specialbusservice.com wrote:
<snip>
Ok if you cant do that why are all webcomics notable?
Because Wikipedia has no space requirements. We have plenty of room to include all webcomics. To choose to include some, but not others, would allow us to make a statement about what is worthwhile and what isn't. It would violate NPOV. Further, the only people who are going to come
across
the article are those who are specifically looking for it. Keeping the article in the encyclopedia provides useful information to those people,
and
doesn't hurt anyone else. If any webcomics are notable, then all
webcomics
are notable.
By your logic: If any people are notable, then all people are notable.
By my logic all people are notable, yes.
Excuse me while I write articles on Anthony DiPierro, Justin Cormack,
and the rest.
Notability is different from verifiability (and no original research), and in any case non-famous (living) people have a legal right to privacy. So if you can find public, verifiable information about me or Justin in respectable secondary sources, I personally think it should be included in Wikipedia.
Can you find public, verifiable information about these webcomics in respectable secondary sources?
- -- Alphax | /"\ Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \