MacGyverMagic/Mgm wrote:
AFD may have had a concensus when it was deleted, but editors (even the ones voting on AFD) are fallible and if like with the professor case, they are not fully aware of certain facts they can make bad decisions. Just because procedure was followed, it shouldn't be automatically assumed, the concensus was correct.
If additional info comes to light on a subject, undeletion should be considered.
And how is a person who did not see the original article supposed to know if his information is "additional"?
Ec