I am still willing to mediate the disputes, my offers for resolution are still open, but I've changed my mind and must demand the page be deleted per the 48 hour rule. Here is the page to delete:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Silverback
Note, that the only two signed statements in the dispute resolution section, are for different disputes, not the same one. Frankly, neither one qualifies. The Bishonen dispute is settled, he admits it. The worst he can say is that it went on a little further and he asked me to stop and I did.
csloat does not really disclose any attempts to resolve the dispute, he jsut points to the talk page. So this is well short of the requirements.
I want it deleted, because I think we need to reform the RfC/user process. After signing the statement and notifying me, they have been modifying it all over the place, even after I have responded, they change the responses underneath me.
I don't think my solution of reverting as vandalism any changes will work, because people don't seem to trust the subject in these proceedings. However, I think the integrity of the certified text and fairness to the respondent requires some solution. I propose that every RfC have a neutral admin assigned who guarantees that the certified text does not change in any way that undermines the response, or presents and unfairly moving target.
Reforming the process is far more important than the RfC of any one user, lets get it done.
-- Silverback