Bryan Derksen wrote:
Keith Old wrote:
Bryan,
If you had knowledge, that suggested it was worthy of retention, why didn't you contribute to the debate?
Because I only found out the article had existed _after_ the vote was closed and the article was deleted, when someone removed a link to the now-nonexistent article from an article I happen to have on my watchlist. I don't visit the AfD page.
Since the VfD was voted on and closed properly according to procedure VfU is unlikely to help. Recreations of deleted pages without a VfU are speediable, it's listed as general criteria #4. Any suggestions on how I might argue a case at this point? I know of no avenues of "appeal" to take to contest a deletion like this.
You can always write an article from scratch. If the assholes speedy it you'll have others on your side to restore it.