I encourage anyone to run, but to not be surprised if the actual work is both confusing and tedious. When you dig into the diffs, it often takes some mulling over to figure out what is going on. An appropriate remedy, not too much, not too little is another matter, then there is the process of arriving at agreement among arbitrators.
Fred
On Oct 5, 2005, at 3:05 PM, Phroziac wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Fred Bauder wrote:
As I previously suggested, we need to run arbitrators through the test of whether they are willing and able to do the work (and take the pressure). I suggest a wide funnel collecting potential arbitrators and easy removal of those who try but fail (measuring failure by actual participation).
Fred
Want a guineau pig for a test of that? Sounds great to me, and I'm interested in running for arbcom. I think. I'm not really sure of anything.
Phroziac | /"\ Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign OpenPGP key ID: 0xC2AF5417 | X Against HTML email & vCards http://tinyurl.com/anya2 | / \ (Computer clock currently thinks it should be set to UTC.)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDREARVLzO3sKvVBcRAkzlAJ46JdNPcSBVljphihYPf/+fKd//5QCfSAzu 9K8OhSl3Z9czcVpnIIxrbLc= =PDgH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l