On 10/2/05, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/2/05, Tony Sidaway f.crdfa@gmail.com wrote:
Quite. All of these failings could be addressed in a five-day AfD-like process where 100 articles are listed at random and either improved to presentable standard or, if consensus exists to reject, marked as in
need of
attention.
Your idea runs into the problem (that inclusionism makes worse) that people want to write about stuff they are interested in.
This isn't a problem. It's what has made English Wikipedia one of the largest reference works in the English language.
Articles on subjects in which nobody shows any interest should probably not be on our main page.