On 11/16/05, Jtkiefer jtkiefer@wordzen.net wrote:
My suggestion is just to ignore them, the guardian has, is, and most likely be anti Wikipedia though for the life of me I don't know why they're so anti-us.
The Guardian absolutely is not opposed to Wikipedia at all. This statement is apparently an utterly ludicrous overreaction to a pretty good attempt by the Guardian to establish how reliable Wikipedia is, by referring selected articles on traditional encyclopedia subjects to experts in their relevant field.
Does failure to fall drooling at our feet now count as opposition?