On 11/21/05, David Gerard fun@thingy.apana.org.au wrote:
You've already *asserted* your bad faith outright, when you proudly declared you were systematically removing content from articles.
Systematically? Prove it (and with permission images don't count). You can't my edits are rarely if ever systematic. We refure to wikipedians as editors not authors. Editing does from time mean removeing material. Material can lose its function within an article if previously it's only function is to pad the article out.
It's a bit odd you now claim you're entitled to a fresh assumption of good faith.
- d.
Yes and no. If we follow the logic that if a person committs one act of bad faith from then on AGF does not apply to them we run into the problem of practicaly formaliseing grudge matches. While this wouldn't really worry me on a personal level I don't think it would produce the kind of community atmosphere people are aiming for. Of course I could be wrong since I'm not aware of any real research into this area.
-- geni