On 11/14/05, Delirium delirium@hackish.org wrote:
geni wrote:
On 11/14/05, Delirium delirium@hackish.org wrote:
I agree---I don't necessarily think a million Pokemon pages are the most useful thing on Wikipedia, but I don't see why it *hurts* anything to have them either.
Considering the world wide profile of pokemon I think your example sucks.
But there is no requirement on Wikipedia that there be a "world wide profile" for our topics. Plenty of our topics, especially on scientific subjects, are interesting only to a handful of specialists. There's no reason not to have these.
-Mark
Sure but they are a walkover to verify for the most part.
-- geni