geni wrote:
Read through the mailing list archives around the time of the 172 issue (a bit before since it was the tony sideways, snowspiner, me and ed poor case that triggered the disscussion).
I am not for a minute saying that it was discussed here. I am just pointing out that discussions here (or, indeed, anywhere, on- or off-wiki), have nothing to do with how the Committee runs itself. It is not a community organisation. The community has, for the time being, agreed that the Committee, Jimbo's experiment, should be treated as sovereign (the "Arbitration policy ratification" documents). That is all.
Yours,