It is standard to delete recreations which are exact copies or very near copies of previously deleted material. If that's not the case ask for undeletion at WP:DRV and tell it was wrongfully deleted as a recreation, because it is not sufficiently similar.
Mgm
On 11/11/05, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/11/05, Jason Y. Lee jylee@cs.ucr.edu wrote:
Since when it has become standard to keep articles and delete recreations on sight? Whatever happen to the philosophy we had on allowing an article to be deleted so that someone with the proper knowledge can properly write the introduction of the article?
-- Jason Y. Lee AKA AllyUnion
Do you have any evidence that such a philosophy existed in the first place? If it ever did is suspect it died over the notabilty arguments.
-- geni _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l