Geni is to be commended, not "suffer a penalty"!
Well, Geni seems like he's just a kid and I didnt mean to pick on him. I would prefer to have just let the issue go, but hes basically claiming that:
'I dont need to give due attention or make intelligent discernments when I take upon myself enforcer duties -- I just need to robotically respond to requests on WP:AN/I and hope that people are equal in tattling on each other.'
Like you said 'the violations were minor' -- is this all because I argued with an improper block, one which Geni himself said was done improperly, and done under "time constraints", and limited only to "reported violations" (which was never in any 3RR draft that Ive read/edited):
I stand by my initial block under the 3RR. Yes I should have blocked the other party but it wasn't reported and due to time restriants I only cheak reported violations. I was contacterble by email for as long as the block lasted. Geni 10:08, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
You are an administrator and expected to more or
less > follow Wikipedia policies and if you can't or won't
ought to gracefully accept the consequences.
Well, sure -- the case system is, just like Geni's inerpretation of the blocking system, means singling people out. And even though there were other policy violations, those can be overlooked because my lack of "gracefulness" tips the scales in your view. I'll go run and consult the Virgin. (Why not just add sarcasm to the charges?)
All good things must come to an end.
Yes, this open discussion about a matter to be decided in private has gone on long enough. As with past matters, I can only hope that my making a fool of myself thusly has some broad and postive, though perhaps embarrasing, effects.
Respectfully, SV
__________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com