On 11/4/05, steve v vertigosteve@yahoo.com wrote:
This is at the heart of the matter, and why the majority voted to punt it back: Under no circumstances would a post-RFAR RFA possibly be considered to be a "normal one." Ask yourself, Benjamin: how is the community to make heads or tails of an RFA as a remedy for a case which the Arbcom itself could only find generic 'findings of fact'?
I think the somunity made it's feelings pretty clear at the RFC but no matter.
You are the second admin to end up on arbcom after pulling a 3RR block I placed on them, In neither case has arbcom had the guts to make a straight descission.
-- geni