Blocking for 3RR is a technical enough procedure, regardless who implements the block, so long as the 3RR has been breached.
Jack states that: "I do not feel that I had violated the 3rr," and of course, he is more than free to substantiate that claim with pertinent evidence, one which indicates that his 'feeling' corresponds to objective reality as others percieve it (i.e. that there was no 3RR).
As for Jack and questionable emails, I'm sure User:FeloniousMonk has a thing or three to say about that.
El_C
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#Use...
I feel I am a "logged-in user(s) with a substantial history of valid contributions, regardless of the reasoning for the block"
I feel that Mel Etitis has a long history of conflict with myself, and should not be blocking me once, much less twice. Comments he made to me by email after the incident (a conversation which I feel should be fully disclosed) make this especially clear. I further feel that I could have been warned, and challenge anyone to suggest that i was aware that my edits were seen to be a 3rr violation, or that if I had been advised thusly that I would have continued to revert. As I made clear in my comment to David here, I do not feel that I had violated the 3rr, and I have no intent to resume the questioned behaviours. I request that I be unblocked.
Jack (User:Sam Spade)