On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 18:49 +0100, sannse wrote:
Derk wrote:
I would have replied directly to the message, but I just signed up to the list. Anyway, this person created an article containing "Arguably, a better name for the article on Evidence_Based_Medicine Evidence Based Medicine." This is not encyclopedic.
Stub? Disambigution page?
He left a
message on my talk page and I had written up a response to him stating that if he wanted to move it, he should sign up for an account and move it, that the article space is not the place for his opinion regarding the title of articles.
That isn't the topic, and it isn't my opinion, it arises form a discussion on an academic list (evidence-based-health@jiscmail.ac.uk which for non-UK people is the joint information services ctee for all UK universities and is populated by people who know far more about EBM/EBH than I but are less au fait with Wikis) upon the definition of EBM. The opinion you'd gather is that EBM is better refered to a subclass of EBH
As I went to reply, I got an edit
conflict on his user talk page in which he decided to call me "cryptodork".
Sorry. Not used to American names and spelling. We usually spell a name Dirk.
And so you banned the guy? Perhaps a little quick on the block button there... one (mildish) comment, and a newbie mistake on what to do with a misnamed page really isn't blockable IMO. Perhaps it's time to revisit [[WP:BITE]]
--sannse _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l