Geoff Burling wrote:
Timwi, I'm not clear where this exchange between us is going.
Nor am I. You are going on about things that I have never contested or even mentioned, and you have not addressed any of what I've actually been trying to tell you.
I'll try again.
I'm trying to tell you that if you are not interested in the images, the presence and absence of images should not make any difference to you because it does not make any difference to the time taken for the *text* to load and display -- unless you have a browser which artificially waits until all images are loaded, in which case I would just simply suggest to upgrade, rather than trying to re-educate everyone in the Wikipedia community on what *you* think is the right amount of images in articles.
Timwi