JAY JG (jayjg@hotmail.com) [050520 06:37]:
Not true. I know there are people who believe *most* school articles should be kept. But the boilerplate votes in short periods of time which make no reference at all to the article or the VfD page are examples of something else, and in particular, when I see someone voting "keep, good stub" etc. on a completely useless stub.
Yeah, that I'd attribute to exasperation. Apparently-spammed nominations leading to apparently-spammed kep votes.
Of course, they might actually think it was a stub with a future. Are any of them working on the school stubs?
Rather than impugning their edits here, you could ask them nicely and see what they say. Might be interesting.
- d.