Blair,
It was legit to unblock you but the biting comments don't help. So keep the personal comments out of it. Play the ball, not the man/men.
I've also been bold and altered the 3RR page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Three-revert_rule#Intent_of_the_polic...
Still not entirely happy with the edits, but I do think 3RR needs to be closer to the "means of last resort" rather than the quick tool it is now.
-Andrew (User:Fuzheado)
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 22:54:55 -0700, Blair P. Houghton blair@houghton.net wrote:
It was a trap. GeorgeStepanek accepted almost all of my edits, but only after I was blocked.
Clearly he wasn't disagreeing with everything I was saying, he was just reverting the page to goad me into re-reverting it. I did, three times. Then I changed the edit to include others' suggestions. Then Taxman continued reverting in GeorgeStepanek's stead. Then they created the false allegations of 3RR violation.
And once the unblock actually allows me into the server, I'll repeat all of this on the talk page so everyone concerned can see the mess these guys made.
--Blair
Andrew Lih wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 01:09:30 -0400, Jim Cecropia jcecropia@mail.com wrote:
I have unblocked Blair P. Houghton so that he can defend himself in the appropriate forums on Wikipedia.
The 3RR, as I've stated elsewhere, is a loose cannon which tends to favor the status-quo. If the there is a content dispute, the better solution is to protect the article for a limited time to get the combatants to hash out the issue in article talk. In the instant case, I notice that GeorgeStepanek, for example, numbered his reverts ("first, second, third") which telegraphs consciousness of the 3RR as a trap, then another editor who disagrees with Houghton picked up on the reverting.
It's dangerous to ascribe intent. Simply numbering one's edits does not mean it's a "trap." In fact, *not* numbering them, and losing count, could be construed as a trap as well.
But I agree that an outside admin would have served the community better by simply locking the page, and not banning anyone. Somehow this needs to be emphasized on the 3RR page - not all 3R violations need to be followed up by a ban.
-Andrew (User:Fuzheado) _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l