I suspect The Recycling Troll is a troll -- that is, a person who craves attention and who finds it entertaining to annoy and provoke others. His username looks like an announcement that he is, the first step towand getting attention, and there is no reason not to believe him. A non-troll is unlikely to choose that as a username.
That said, "being a troll" is not a violation of our policies. Our policies are formulated in terms of behaviours, and we shouldn't be banning people who comply with the policies and norms of the project because we don't like the motivation behind their behaviour. If a troll finds away to get attention and to be provocative without violating our policies, then we should reconsider our policies. We shouldn't be banning people simply because they are thought to be trolls.
Concerning, RT's behaviours in this instance, what is wrong with them. In fact, members of Wikipedia are routinely monitored by administrators and other members. There is nothing wrong with it. If A is working on an article and notices that B's edits are questionable (by A's lights), it seems fine with me if A checks other articles that B has worked on, or is working on, to see if he is propagating his supposed errors into other articles. I don't see anything wrong with that, although no doubt B might find it quite annoying to have someone following him around. As long as A's edits are within policy, I don't see that there is any Wikipedia policy that is being violated. Indeed, if B is indeed a "POV-warrior", then A's behaviour might well be hailed as a service to the community. Who decides who can monitor whom? Are administrators immune from being monitored?
Presuming that RT is a troll, he has noticed that RickK is a bit excitable, and that he doesn't have the full support of all other administrators, and he has decided to get attention by targetting him. He is doing it in a way that is entirely within policy. The solution is not to make up rules in order to ban him, or to allow him to provoke a reaction from the administrators that will bring discredit upon them rather than him.
The solution, as with all trolls is "Do not feed the trolls". In other words, ignore him. An administrator, above all, must be able to do this, because trolls will try to provoke administrators as a favorite target, knowing that provoking an over-reaction from an administrator is the best way to cause dissension and get attention.
So, I repeat: ignore him. If he can't get a reaction by being annoying within the the rules of the site, he will either get bored or he will be compelled to break an actual policy of the project, and then he can be blocked without doing violence to the principles underpinning the project.