I think you should just start doing those things. The questions and answers will be on the record and will be evidence which we can consider especially when we look at remedies.
Fred
From: Theresa Knott theresaknott@gmail.com Reply-To: Theresa Knott theresaknott@gmail.com, English Wikipedia wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 20:10:32 +0000 To: Brian M brian1954@gmail.com, English Wikipedia wikien-l@wikipedia.org Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] ArbCom - too attached to 'equal treatment'?
I agree. I came to the AC after it was formed and it's way of working was set. But personally i hate the jargon and the quasilegalistic way of working. I would like to go to the people concerned and ask questions "Why did you remove that chunk of text" "Do you regret calling him a shithead and have you said or done anything by way of an aplogy" "If you had to to it again, would you have handled it differently?" that sort of thing. I'd like things to be far more informal than they are at the moment, but i don't know how the community feel about that, and i don't want to break a process, that basically works (even though it has its faults)
Theresa