zero 0000 wrote
The accuser is treated worse than the accused.
The argument, I take it, is that the ArbCom should only be able to apply remedies to the editor complained of.
OK - suppose that was agreed today - how long would it take for every 'accused' to figure out that it is possible to bring a countersuit against the 'accuser'? Now an number of those suits would no doubt be thrown right out by the ArbCom. But for those where there is not such a clear case, wouldn't it come to much the current position?
Charles