actionforum@comcast.net wrote:
-------------- Original message --------------
There are some minor issues, but I can't see anything overly serious, particularly considering that 172 has had two massive articles (relating to these topics, too) featured in this period, which suggests to me that he is making an effort to reform.
Desysopping does not mean he can't continue to edit articles, although it may lessen his powers to enforce his severe authorial territorialism through vendettas.
What might be an interesting approach when accusations are made would be to have the promoter of a failed accusation serve the same fate that he sought to have applied on the accused. Thus if he seeks to have someone de-sysopped and fails he would be de-sysopped; if seeks to have the person banned for a month and fails he would be banned for a month. etc.
It might put an end to all the whining. ;-)
Ec