On 6/15/05, Rick giantsrick13@yahoo.com wrote:
I don't think I have *ever* witnessed an admin protect a page to revistion that person did not favour. So it can't be *totally* random. :) I'd say that the custom is to protect to a the version that gets most votes, if the number of votes one casts is proportional to how much social influence one has. But it is a bad custom. Besides, now you have also received a written *request* to change to the majority opinions version. SlimVirgin also said that she would "allow" other persons than Eyeon to edit the page.
What an utterly OUTRAGEOUS comment! Who the HELL do you think you are? To make such a vicious attack on the good names of each and every single admin?! I am appalled, and I, personally, demand an apology!
What completely random outrage. I don't see anything claimed about that anyone should be offended about. I am appalled, and I, personally, demand emails to the list that actually make sense!