I thought categories were for rational organization? In any event, I don't consider categories very explicit -- at least in the Monobook skin, they are at the BOTTOM of the page, the LAST thing available to the reader. I like my nonsense to be labeled in a bright neon sign, if possible. But I understand this to be a somewhat undefendable bias of sorts.
FF
On 6/14/05, Timwi timwi@gmx.net wrote:
Fastfission wrote:
I think making it VERY explicit -- i.e. in the title of an article -- that a given description of events is a work of imagination rather than some sort of factual account is always a good idea.
But that's what categories are for.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l