From: BJörn Lindqvist bjourne@gmail.com
I don't know what you expect, Björn, but a certain degree of protection is needed for anyone who's been submitted to an arbcom complaint. We can't just let anyone accuse someone without the arbcom being given evidence of the violations in question.
I think that is unrelated to the fact that The System, as it currently is constructed, does not work for an editor being harassed by an admin.
Actually, it doesn't appear to work very well for admins who are being harrassed by editors.
Besides, there is ample evidence in the diffs. Evidence that has been collected and also ignored.
What specific evidence are you talking about?
BTW Arbcom complaints don't need to be signed by someone else, that
RFCs.
I didn't know that. Has it changed recently? Last time I checked the procedure was exactly as I described.
No, it has always been that way. You're confusing RfC with RfAR.
I even witnessed first-hand a user trying the ArbCom route and failing because he/she could not get a second user involved in the dispute to back him/her up. Which wasn't very strange because there really only was he/she and the admin involved..
I strongly doubt that, since that's not part of the Arbitration Committee procedure. Which case are you referring to?
Jay.