Fred Bauder (fredbaud@ctelco.net) [050723 23:40]:
I suppose a problematic example could be found on the borderland and discussed, but I think it is best to solve the problem when it arises rather than to make policy based on hypothetical examples. Perhaps this is just my common law heritage speaking here...
I agree. Editorial judgement is ideally what we want being used in all cases. Making policy satisfies those constitutionally unable to tolerate ambiguity, but mostly it creates handy weaponry for querulous wikilawyers * to try to use to get their way. [[Wikipedia is not]] a game of [[nomic]].
- d.
* as opposed to wiki lawyers, such as Fred ;-)