[With]in [the context of] Mormonism, Nephi is...
Seems fairly neutral to me. However there are valid concerns that n/10 average random articles fail to put things in this context, and carry this through. Its easy to be overly general ("worrying trends") or overly particular ("Nephi") and miss the balance.
SV
--- Delirium delirium@hackish.org wrote:
I don't see a problem with that article. What else is there to say about it? The Book of Mormon claims something about a person named "Nephi", and we report "the Book of Mormon claims the following about Nephi".
Do we need to explicitly say "however,
people who think the Book of Mormon is mostly hogwash think this claim is also hogwash"? Should we add to the [[Nirvana]] and [[Shiva]] articles that a lot of people think that Nirvana is nonsense and Shiva might not actually exist?
____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs